It can be inferred from the passage that most legal scholars today would agree with the realists that A. Linguistic vagueness can cause indeterminacy regarding the outcome of a litigated case. B. In any litigated case, several different and possibly contradictory legal rules are relevant to the decision of the case. C. The distinction between holding and dicta in a written opinion is usually difficult to determine in practice. D. The boundaries of applicability of terms may sometimes be difficult to determine, but the core meanings of the terms are well established. E. A common-law system gives judges tremendous leeway in interpreting precedents, and contradictor readings of precedential cases can usually be found.